Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Early Paleozoic

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Natih Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Natih Fm base reconstruction

Natih Fm


Period: 
Cretaceous

Age Interval: 
Albian – Turonian, On (1,2)


Province: 
Oman

Type Locality and Naming

The Natih Formation is recognized across most of the Arabian Gulf and had formed the interior part of an extensive carbonate platform that covered the eastern part of the Arabian Shield during the middle Cretaceous. It is the upper formation in the Wasai Gr of Oman. Type and reference sections: Fahud-3, drilled as Fahud North-3 in North Oman. The surface reference section is in Wadi Al Muaydin, with a thickness of 344 m. Additional reference sections are Suwaihat-1 in Central Oman, and Nimr-1 in South Oman. Column: Oman Subsurface, Oman Outcrop. The Formation consists of a number of repetitive sedimentary cycles ranging from several tens to 150 m in thickness and these have been used to subdivide seven informal members designated by the letters A–G from top to base (Hughes Clarke, 1988; Scott, 1990). Philip et al. (1995) proposed a correlation of these informal members to the outcrop sections in the Oman Mountains.

Synonym:


Lithology and Thickness

An interbedded sequence of chalky limestones and calcareous shales subdivided into members, each comprising an upper limestone overlying a basal shale. The shales are distinctive, varicolored olive brown and green, which is unlike other shales but identical to the Nahr Umr in general fauna and lithology. Source-rock facies (bituminous limestones) occur in the B and E members in the North and north Central Oman (van Buchem et al., 1996; also Homewood et al., 2008). The repetitive sedimentary cycles ranging from several tens to 150 m in thickness and these have been used to subdivide seven informal members designated by the letters A–G from top to base (Hughes Clarke, 1988; Scott, 1990). Philip et al. (1995) proposed a correlation of these informal members to the outcrop sections in the Oman Mountains. Each member represents a sedimentary cycle: from basal, generally thin, variably argillaceous mud- supported units followed by thick shallowing-upward carbonates ending with shell-rich or pelletal-skeletal, grain-supported units. Superimposed on these cycles two to five, third-order, generally shoaling-upward sequences have been distinguished (Scott, 1990; van Buchem et al., 2002; Droste and van Steenwinkel, 2004; Homewood et al., 2008).

Members: G = basal thin carbonate; .F = relatively thin shale to carbonate, E = thick lower carbonate (latest Albian) and upper medium-thin shale (earliest Cenomanian), D-C (upper Cenomanian) and B-A (Cenomanian/Turonian transition) = relatively thin cycles of shale to carbonate.


Lithology Pattern: 
Shallow-marine marl


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

The lower boundary is usually conformable and transitional from the underlying Nahr Umr Fm.

Upper contact

Sedimentation was terminated by a regional emergence causing erosion and leaching of the Natih Fm (Grélaud et al., 2006), as well as in the coeval Mishrif Fm across most of the eastern Arabian Gulf (Alsharhan and Nairn, 1993; Alsharhan, 1995). Current datings suggest a likely Mid-Late Turonian (possibly into Early Coniacian) age for this downcutting event. In Oman, the shaly units of the Fiqa Fm (Aruma Gr) disconformably overlie the Natih carbonates, which, over structural highs and to the south and east, have varying amounts of the upper cycles truncated..

Regional extent

The Natih Fm is recognized across most of the Arabian Gulf. It forms the interior part of an extensive carbonate platform that covered the eastern margin of the Arabian Shield during the mid-Cretaceous. The Natih Fm occurs throughout Oman, although truncated strongly to completely over local positive features, e.g., absent in the Lekhwair area. The lowermost two members; Natih F to Natih G are considered equivalent to the Mauddud Fm, whilst the overlying members Natih E to Natih A are the lateral equivalent to the large-scale shallowing upwards succession identified within the Shilaif Fm (Khatiyah Fm) and Mishrif Fm (van Buchem et al., 1996).


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[56.61,25.9],[56.59,25.95],[56.42,24.85],[57.05,24.04],[57.72,23.77],[58.58,23.65],[59.12,22.75],[59.82,22.49],[58.43,22.8],[57.2,22.86],[56.15,23.49],[56.21,21.16],[54.98,19.52],[53.67,17.21],[53.35,16.9],[53.71,16.37],[55.1,16.58],[57.6,17.33],[58.17,17.22],[58.18,18.81],[60.41,21.35],[60.22,22.98],[56.61,25.9]]]]}}

Fossils

Ammonites, microfossils, nannofossils, etc. Biozones F62 (Dohaia planata, Dictyoconella minima) to F57 (Orbitolina concava), Sub- biozone F577 (Hedbergella washitensis).


Age 

Late Albian – earliest Turonian (locally to middle Turonian. "Sharland et al. (2001) place their MFS K140 to K110 surfaces within the Natih Formation. See Homewood et al. (2008) for a brief discussion of ages (their figure 5). Bulot et al. (2011?) place the Albian – Cenomanian boundary towards the base of Natih E. Jacovides and Varol (2000), however, extend the Upper Albian as high as Natih C, where they update the microfaunal zonation of Sikkema (1991) and propose new datings, based primarily on nannofossil data. Further work is therefore required to reconcile ammonite, microfaunal, and nannofossil data. Ammonite findings discussed in Kennedy and Simmons (1991) and van Buchem et al. (1996) indicate an intra-Natih A, Early Turonian age from the deeper-water settings of the western Adam Foothills (near the southern limit of the Al Hajar Mountains in the Afar area). Bulot et al. (2011?) similarly place the Cenomanian – Turonian boundary within Natih A, at Wadi Qusaybah. Note, however, that Sharland et al. (2001) argue for a revision of earlier work and propose an Early Turonian age for upper Natih B (their MFS K140, surface 8e of van Buchem et al., 1996). Packer and Zucchi (2002) used combined nannofossil and microfaunal data to interpret Early (?) and Middle Turonian ages in marly limestones and calcareous claystones of the uppermost Natih Formation in two wells in North Oman. These comprise thin, less than 10-m-thick, locally developed latest Natih sections. These units are probably time equivalent to Large Scale Sequence IV of van Buchem et al. (2002), which comprises deeper water, transgressive deposits in the Tanuf Fm to Nakhr Fm area (Al Hajar Mountains). Clear uncertainties remain concerning some of the detailed age calibrations applied to the Formation. Homewood et al. (2008) recognize a thickness of up to ca. 30 m of this Sequence IV in Fahud wells, whereas in Jabal Qusaybah (Afar area) and also in sections from Jabal Tanuf to Wadi Al Muaydin (Al Hajar Mountains) they split this unit further to interpret an uppermost Natih Sequence V (grainstone association, channel complex).

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Albian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.7

    Beginning date (Ma): 
104.31

    Ending stage: 
Turonian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
0.25

    Ending date (Ma):  
92.77

Depositional setting

It forms the interior part of an extensive carbonate platform that covered the eastern margin of the Arabian Shield during the mid Cretaceous. The Natih Fm records the transition of the Arabian Gulf from a tectonically stable shelf margin to a flexural basin, subsiding in response to the westward obduction of an accretionary prism (Semail/Hawasina). In the Oman area the depositional setting of the Natih Formation alternated between an extremely broad and flat, submerged-to-emergent platform setting (G, F, D and C members), and moderately deeper-water, intra-shelf basins, with anoxic conditions allowing deposition of source rocks (E, B and A members) (van Buchem et al., 1996, 2002; Homewood et al., 2008). Droste and van Steenwinkel (2004) provide a detailed seismostratigraphic underpinned model for the development of the Natih intra-shelf carbonates.


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information

Further studies focussing on the Oman outcrops were published by Schwab et al. (2005), building a seismic model based on outcrop data, and Grélaud et al. (2006) documenting incision surfaces in the Natih. The outcrop sedimentology in Oman is extensively documented by Homewood et al. (2008).


Compiler:  

From Forbes, G.A., Hansen, H.S.M., and Shreurs, J., 2010. Lexicon of Oman: Subsurface Stratigraphy. Gulf Petrolink, 371 pp. (plus enclosures and CD); and Middle East Geological Timescale 2008 Al-Husseini, Journal of Middle East Petroleum Geosciences v 13. no. 4. Steineke et. al., 1958, Page 1310